Introduction
In a criminal proceeding, plea bargaining is the process wherein an agreement is formed between the prosecution and the defense regarding the charges that are brought against the accused. Usually, the prosecution will offer to drop or reduce some of the charges in exchange for a guilty plea or a no contest plea from the defendant.
Agreements reached during plea bargaining are subject to the approval of the court, and there are various laws governing the regulation of it. These laws often vary from state to state in terms of how and when they can be resorted to. In federal cases, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines regulate the process.
When Plea Bargaining May Be Entered Into
Plea bargaining can be entered any time from the moment of arrest up until an official verdict is read. However, it is usually more advantageous for the defendant to seek plea bargaining before they have been charged with the offense(s). This is because the person sometimes may not be able to have charges dropped or reduced after the charges have been formally filed.
Also, it is better to seek plea bargaining at the beginning of trial, so that the accused does not have to waste valuable time and resources sitting through the entire length of the trial. Thus, for the criminally accused, it is best to retain an attorney without delay so that they have the option of plea bargaining as early as possible in the proceedings.
Types
There are basically three different types of plea bargaining. The first two are the most commonly employed:
Charge bargaining: the defendant pleads guilty to a less serious charge than the one initially imposed. For example, a prosecutor may offer to have the charges reduced from felony theft charge to misdemeanor theft. This would effectively eliminate a prison sentence. Count bargaining: the defendant pleads guilty to a fewer number of criminal charges. This usually happens when one criminal act leads to an accumulation of charges. Reducing the number of charges might also reduce or avoid prison time. Sentence bargaining: the defendant pleads guilty knowing beforehand what the sentencing period will be. A sentence such as prison time or fines will then be reduced accordingly. This is not that common as a defendant may not always know their sentence beforehand.
Therefore, depending on the defendant's charges, any one of these plea bargaining methods may be employed, or a mixture of the different types. Of the three, count bargaining tends to reduce the time of trial proceedings- if an entire count is dropped, then the court does not have to proceed in analyzing that charge. Count bargaining can dramatically reduce court time.
In all three types of plea bargaining, the main goal is to usually avoid prison time altogether; if this can be accomplished in it, this is much better for the defendant.
Broken deals: What if the prosecution or the defendant breaks the plea bargain agreement?
The court views plea bargaining as having a contractual nature. This means that the court requires both parties to comply with their side of the bargain. Also, the court assumes that both parties will be completely informed as to the consequences of entering into the agreement.
If the defendant breaks the agreement: Usually the defendant must fulfill certain tasks in order to have charges dropped or reduced. These can include pleading guilty, testifying against another defendant, or cooperating in various investigations. If the defendant accepts a plea bargain but does not complete their tasks, the prosecution is allowed to revoke the plea bargain and reinstate the original charges.
If the prosecution breaks the agreement: The prosecutor also has the responsibility to perform their part of the plea bargain. For example, if the prosecutor files the charges after agreeing to reduce some of them, the defendant has a number of options. The defendant may then seek a court order compelling the prosecution to respect the plea bargain. Alternatively, they may request to have the plea set aside.
Advantages
The most obvious advantage of plea bargaining is having charges reduced or dropped. This would allow the defendant to have a cleaner criminal record than if the charges were instated. Other benefits of plea bargaining are:
Less money spent on trial and attorney's fees Avoiding the hassle of trial altogether Avoiding a stigmatizing criminal charge on one's record Avoiding unnecessary publicity Helps keep the courts unburdened with too many cases
Criticisms of the Plea Bargaining System
The plea bargaining system has received numerous criticisms over the years, particularly in American jurisprudence. The most major criticism is that it is unconstitutional because it supposedly denies the accused their right to a trial by jury. This is understandable, because sometimes a defendant may immediately plead guilty to a crime just to avoid trial. They might not ever know if they would be found guilty or not had the court proceeded with the trial.
However, as stated before, it is contractual in nature, and defendants don't have to enter into plea bargaining without the counsel of a lawyer. They will always be well informed of the consequences of any decisions made and so it is up to the defendant if they wish to forgo trial.
Thus, plea bargaining does involve some amount of risk on the part of the defendant, who may not always know exactly how a jury would rule. Some law firms actually employ a risk-assessment analysis in dealing with it. They weigh the amount of time and money that would be probably be spent in trial and compare it with the amount expended as a result of bargaining.
Other criticisms are due to images of plea bargaining portrayed in the media. Many associate it with intense threats or coercion aimed at the defendant in order to make them plead guilty. Or, some feel that it allows people who should be punished to get off with less prison time. In most cases, depictions of plea bargaining in movies or on television are over-dramatized. Many depictions of plea bargaining are not accurate and would violate a defendant's rights if they were to happen in an actual criminal proceeding.
Finally, much literature has been written on what is termed the "prisoner's dilemma". The prisoner's dilemma occurs when two suspects are called upon to testify against each other in court, irrespective of the other's guilt or innocence. Because the prisoner's dilemma can raise difficulty in testimonies, some countries actually do not allow plea bargaining when the prisoner's dilemma arises. American courts attempt to remedy the dilemma through constitutional rights such as the right of confrontation. The right to confrontation provides for defendants to testify in their own capacity, while omitting portions that might incriminate a co-defendant.
Conclusion
The vast majority of criminal cases in the United States are determined by plea bargaining rather than jury trials. If there were no plea bargaining system and all the cases on the docket were tried it is certain that courts would be overworked and backlogged.
Plea bargaining is often a good option. However, some attorneys would suggest that the defendant take the case to trial if they feel that the outcome is close or there is too much risk. Plea bargaining is best considered as a tool of the judiciary system that allows defendants to bypass much of the court process. This means the decision to plea bargain is in the hands of the defendant, and they should not feel that they are being coerced at any point in the proceedings.
Plea Bargaining - Getting Your Criminal Charges Reduced Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Ken LaMance is the Corporate Counsel at LegalMatch ( http://www.legalmatch.com ), an online client-lawyer matching company based out of San Francisco, California. LegalMatch is fast, free, and confidential. LegalMatch is America's original attorney/client matching service and is not a referral service. When a consumer presents their issue to LegalMatch, our system matches the consumer's case to LegalMatch lawyers in their city or county based on the specifics of the consumer's case, lawyer's location, and area of legal practice. LegalMatch also offers a number of useful resources like an online law library, tips, law blog, and legal forums on nearly every topic ( http://forums.legalmatch.com ).
watches cell phone Buy Cheap Denso 950 0152 Fuel Pump For Stuhrling Original Apocalypse Skeleton Cheap Stuhrling Original Alpine Skeleton Cheap